I’ve watched Apple rise and fall several times over the past 15+ years of using their computers. Interesting times were happening when Mac’s were almost going the way of IBM, and clones were taking up a significant market share, back in the late 1990’s. The clone licensing was revoked because one of the core values of Apple Computers has always been an emphasis on the quality of the user experience, and this quality was reinforced by the closed box unity of hardware and software. With the return of Steve Jobs, Apple rebranded itself with the “Think Different” campaign, equating their machines with the same creative genius as Picasso and Einstein, firmly taking the reigns of creativity as a customer-enabling selling point and running with it.
(more…)
15 June, 2009
Apple’s One to One Program Attacks Core Customer Base!
14 April, 2009
Record albums will still be made after perishing as a commodity

- Image via Wikipedia
Various pundits have been predicting the ‘death of the album’ for a long time now. The popular rationale, advanced ever since Napster, is that since we are consuming music in 3-5 minute song chunks, there are far fewer reasons to purchase and experience an album in one shot. Before the MP3, there is no random access seeks in vinyl recordings, short of knocking the arm across the disc, hence the emergence of the linear album as the dominant presentation by which music may be purchased and experienced.
Digital music has changed the format of this presentation from a single, long form experience to bite-sized, easily digestible snippets of songs. Several songs strung together can tell a story with much more nuance and depth then can a single. Of course, the artist, producer and engineers determine whether or not this story is presented as a seamless entity in it’s entirety. Since the recording industry as a whole has focused on radio-friendly singles, not generally whole albums, it’s easy to extrapolate from history and come to the conclusion of how singles will be the future of music.
However, there are many releases which exist as a whole entity, made up of discrete parts, concept albums for example. You cannot say that because the recording industry will perish that the album as a presentation will not persist. Even in a scenario put forth by Gerd Leonhard, “Music Like Water“, where music is basically a media utility you buy into with a subscription fee, compilations in the form of albums will be much more rare. Collections of songs, however, (mixtapes being the lowest barrier to contribute here) form a gestalt entity, where the whole is greater then the sum of it’s parts, and will never be obsolete.
Looking at some of my favorite albums (forgive my conventional taste in greatness), The Downward Spiral, Dark Side of the Moon and Hell Awaits all have a few things in common. The central themes rotate through various lenses of interpretation, both sonically and lyrically. Albums allow for all the story-telling tricks we praise in the film world, foreshadowing, character development, climax, resolution, peripatia and anagnorisis. The production quality is quite high on all these releases which allows for persistent auditory themes throughout the album. This is the most important part, in my opinion, because it serves as a link between one song and each other in the collection. Yet, there is enough distinction that each song does not sound the same as the others, a sin committed by virtually every pop record produced in 2000.
That’s what it boils down to, ultimately, is focused effort on the part of the artists and producers. If you’re looking at something as a business equation, you want maximum results for minimum inputs. It just hasn’t been worth the effort to make entire albums stand out. Perhaps then album will perish because nobody wants to put the effort into making something which will be appreciated by so few. Since when did the lack of an audience stop an artist?
Albums will continue to be created because there are still musicians on the planet.
Now, the ‘death of the rock star‘ is something I believe will happen, with all certainty. That’s another thought for another time. Until then, thanks for reading, and I welcome your comments below.

10 April, 2009
A Journey Through Google Trends (includes surprise ending)
So, one day, as we are all wont to do, I decided to explore some of the comparative possibilities of Google Trends.
Of course, it’s necessary to see as a starting point, in the eternal war of good vs evil, which side is winning.
Huzzah, good lives to fight the fight another day, although evil had a recent spike. Note that good has been on the rise since 2004… and tends to dip during the XMAS season.
Maybe if evil had a different name, it might fare a little better in the competition.
Wow! They’re pretty close. It’s times like this that I wish Trends gave actual numbers, but that would be google exposing it’s inner data, which isn’t kosher for passover.
Well, existential concerns and eternal struggle aside, what do we really prioritize?
Well, there is a clear winner here. Obviously we’re FAR more concerned about money then happiness.
So, who gets more attention, those who have money, or those who do not?
Well, no surprise here, the rich own the media and are the gatekeepers of information, so naturally, there are 2x more mentions of what the rich experience in this world then the poor.
Yet if we phrase it a different way, it seems that we USED to be more interested in the plight of the poor. 
But now, we are more concerned with the plight of the wealthy.
I wonder why this is, what are our priorities, in terms of how we treat eachother?
Oh I see. Selfishness is on the rise, while charity has been on a baseline.
Perhaps it’s a matter of attitude?
Even with all the rhetoric, hope and fear are still neck and neck.
Hope and fear put in terms of money, what is our income to debt ratio?
Getting smaller every day, indeed, last year our money fears almost overcame our business performance. News stories crossed over.
How are hope and fear promoted on the news?
Freedom seems to be on the decline, while terror maintains steadily, with occasional spikes equating to terror events.
To get away from it all, what do we turn to?
Wow, sex wins out! We’re really interested in sex, apparently.
Ok, so rock and roll is kind of a generic phrase, how about music?
Sex is more popular then music, and the gap is widening.
Ok ok, so this is the internet, populated by geeks much more interested in cold machines then warm, soft bodies. 
Maybe not.
Ok, so what out there gets more interest and hype then sex?
News comes close, you’d think our addiction to current information could match our interest in sex, but no.
So maybe, money? Could money be more interesting then sex?
Wow, so much for gold diggers. This was kind of surprising actually.
What about love, could it be that love contains greater interest for us then sex?
Close, but not very. Maybe back in happy, idyllic 2004 when we were all spending frivilously.
Surely power, electricity, social standing, the raw, visceral respect and fear of others, is more engaging then sex.
Power, love, money, news, nothing even comes close.
So what on this earth could be more popular then sex?
No comment.
Technorati Tags: google trends, storytelling, society, research





